Original summary: The market for wrist-worn devices is growing at previously unheard-of speeds. A consequence of their fast commercialization is a lack of adequate studies testing their accuracy on varied populations and pursuits. To provide an understanding of wearable sensors for sports medicine, the present study examined heart rate (HR) measurements of four popular wrist-worn devices, the (Fitbit Charge (FB), Apple Watch (AW), Tomtom runner Cardio (TT), and Samsung G2 (G2)), and compared them with gold standard measurements derived by continuous electrocardiogram examination (ECG). Eight athletes participated in a comparative study undergoing maximal stress testing on a cycle ergometer or a treadmill. We analyzed 1,286 simultaneous HR data pairs between the tested devices and the ECG. The four devices were reasonably accurate at the lowest activity level. However, at higher levels of exercise intensity the FB and G2 tended to underestimate HR values during intense physical effort, while the TT and AW devices were fairly reliable. Our results suggest that HR estimations should be considered cautiously at specific intensities. Indeed, an effective intervention is required to register accurate HR readings at high-intensity levels (above 150 bpm). It is important to consider that even though none of these devices are certified or sold as medical or safety devices, researchers must nonetheless evaluate wrist-worn wearable technology in order to fully understand how HR affects psychological and physical health, especially under conditions of more intense exercise.
English summary:The market for wrist-worn devices is growing at previously unheard-of speeds. A consequence of their fast commercialization is a lack of adequate studies testing their accuracy on varied populations and pursuits. To provide an understanding of wearable sensors for sports medicine, the present study examined heart rate (HR) measurements of four popular wrist-worn devices, the (Fitbit Charge (FB), Apple Watch (AW), Tomtom runner Cardio (TT), and Samsung G2 (G2)), and compared them with gold standard measurements derived by continuous electrocardiogram examination (ECG). Eight athletes participated in a comparative study undergoing maximal stress testing on a cycle ergometer or a treadmill. We analyzed 1,286 simultaneous HR data pairs between the tested devices and the ECG. The four devices were reasonably accurate at the lowest activity level. However, at higher levels of exercise intensity the FB and G2 tended to underestimate HR values during intense physical effort, while the TT and AW devices were fairly reliable. Our results suggest that HR estimations should be considered cautiously at specific intensities. Indeed, an effective intervention is required to register accurate HR readings at high-intensity levels (above 150 bpm). It is important to consider that even though none of these devices are certified or sold as medical or safety devices, researchers must nonetheless evaluate wrist-worn wearable technology in order to fully understand how HR affects psychological and physical health, especially under conditions of more intense exercise.
Spanish layman's summary:
Las pulseras inteligentes que controlan nuestra actividad física son cada vez más comunes. En este artículo, comparamos cuatro marcas de dispositivos de monitorización de la actividad física para comprobar cómo funcionan para altas frecuencias cardíacas y niveles de esfuerzo muy elevados y si podemos confiar en ellas para las alertas de emergencia.
English layman's summary:
Wrist-worn devices that monitor health and exercise data are becoming ubiquitous. In this article, we compare four brands of physical activity monitoring devices to check how well they cope with very high heart rates and exertion levels and if we can trust them for emergency alerts.
Keywords: heart rate; wearables; physical exertion; exercise prescription; digital health; monitoring; photopletismography; accuracy; medical devices
JCR Impact Factor and WoS quartile: 3,800 - Q2 (2023)
DOI reference:
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020254
Published on paper: February 2023.
Published on-line: February 2023.
Citation:
P. Martín-Escudero, A.M. Cabanas, M.L. Dotor, M. Galindo, F. Miguel-Tobal, C. Fernández-Pérez, M. Fuentes-Ferrer, R. Giannetti, Are activity wrist-worn devices accurate for determining heart rate during intense exercise?. Bioengineering. Vol. 10, nº. 2, pp. 254-1 - 254-18, February 2023. [Online: February 2023]
Download this paper